Last data update: May 06, 2024. (Total: 46732 publications since 2009)
Records 1-30 (of 170 Records) |
Query Trace: Chu M[original query] |
---|
Estimating causes of death where there is no medical certification: evolution and state of the art of verbal autopsy
Chandramohan D , Fottrell E , Leitao J , Nichols E , Clark SJ , Alsokhn C , Cobos Munoz D , AbouZahr C , Di Pasquale A , Mswia R , Choi E , Baiden F , Thomas J , Lyatuu I , Li Z , Larbi-Debrah P , Chu Y , Cheburet S , Sankoh O , Mohamed Badr A , Fat DM , Setel P , Jakob R , de Savigny D . Glob Health Action 12/28/2021 14 1982486 Over the past 70 years, significant advances have been made in determining the causes of death in populations not served by official medical certification of cause at the time of death using a technique known as Verbal Autopsy (VA). VA involves an interview of the family or caregivers of the deceased after a suitable bereavement interval about the circumstances, signs and symptoms of the deceased in the period leading to death. The VA interview data are then interpreted by physicians or, more recently, computer algorithms, to assign a probable cause of death. VA was originally developed and applied in field research settings. This paper traces the evolution of VA methods with special emphasis on the World Health Organization's (WHO)'s efforts to standardize VA instruments and methods for expanded use in routine health information and vital statistics systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). These advances in VA methods are culminating this year with the release of the 2022 WHO Standard Verbal Autopsy (VA) Toolkit. This paper highlights the many contributions the late Professor Peter Byass made to the current VA standards and methods, most notably, the development of InterVA, the most commonly used automated computer algorithm for interpreting data collected in the WHO standard instruments, and the capacity building in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) that he promoted. This paper also provides an overview of the methods used to improve the current WHO VA standards, a catalogue of the changes and improvements in the instruments, and a mapping of current applications of the WHO VA standard approach in LMICs. It also provides access to tools and guidance needed for VA implementation in Civil Registration and Vital Statistics Systems at scale. |
Comparative diagnostic utility of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen and molecular testing in a community setting
Kim AE , Bennett JC , Luiten K , O'Hanlon JA , Wolf CR , Magedson A , Han PD , Acker Z , Regelbrugge L , McCaffrey KM , Stone J , Reinhart D , Capodanno BJ , Morse SS , Bedford T , Englund JA , Boeckh M , Starita LM , Uyeki TM , Carone M , Weil A , Chu HY . J Infect Dis 2024 BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detection rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) have become widely utilized but longitudinal characterization of their community-based performance remains incompletely understood. METHODS: This prospective longitudinal study at a large public university in Seattle, WA utilized remote enrollment, online surveys, and self-collected nasal swab specimens to evaluate Ag-RDT performance against real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) in the context of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron. Ag-RDT sensitivity and specificity within 1 day of rRT-PCR were evaluated by symptom status throughout the illness episode and Orf1b cycle threshold (Ct). RESULTS: From February to December 2022, 5,757 participants reported 17,572 Ag-RDT results and completed 12,674 rRT-PCR tests, of which 995 (7.9%) were rRT-PCR-positive. Overall sensitivity and specificity were 53.0% (95% CI: 49.6-56.4%) and 98.8% (98.5-99.0%), respectively. Sensitivity was comparatively higher for Ag-RDTs used 1 day after rRT-PCR (69.0%), 4 to 7 days post-symptom onset (70.1%), and Orf1b Ct ≤20 (82.7%). Serial Ag-RDT sensitivity increased with repeat testing ≥2 (68.5%) and ≥4 (75.8%) days after an initial Ag-RDT-negative result. CONCLUSION: Ag-RDT performance varied by clinical characteristics and temporal testing patterns. Our findings support recommendations for serial testing following an initial Ag-RDT-negative result, especially among recently symptomatic persons or those at high-risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection. |
Remote surveillance and detection of SARS-CoV-2 transmission among household members in King County, Washington
Emanuels A , Casto AM , Heimonen J , O'Hanlon J , Chow EJ , Ogokeh C , Rolfes MA , Han PD , Hughes JP , Uyeki TM , Frazar C , Chung E , Starita LM , Englund JA , Chu HY . BMC Infect Dis 2024 24 (1) 309 BACKGROUND: Early during the COVID-19 pandemic, it was important to better understand transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Household contacts of infected individuals are particularly at risk for infection, but delays in contact tracing, delays in testing contacts, and isolation and quarantine posed challenges to accurately capturing secondary household cases. METHODS: In this study, 346 households in the Seattle region were provided with respiratory specimen collection kits and remotely monitored using web-based surveys for respiratory illness symptoms weekly between October 1, 2020, and June 20, 2021. Symptomatic participants collected respiratory specimens at symptom onset and mailed specimens to the central laboratory in Seattle. Specimens were tested for SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR with whole genome sequencing attempted when positive. SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals were notified, and their household contacts submitted specimens every 2 days for 14 days. RESULTS: In total, 1371 participants collected 2029 specimens that were tested; 16 individuals (1.2%) within 6 households tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during the study period. Full genome sequences were generated from 11 individuals within 4 households. Very little genetic variation was found among SARS-CoV-2 viruses sequenced from different individuals in the same household, supporting transmission within the household. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates web-based surveillance of respiratory symptoms, combined with rapid and longitudinal specimen collection and remote contact tracing, provides a viable strategy to monitor households and detect household transmission of SARS-CoV-2. TRIAL REGISTRATION IDENTIFIER: NCT04141930, Date of registration 28/10/2019. |
Genetic diversity of G9, G3, G8 and G1 rotavirus group A strains circulating among children with acute gastroenteritis in Vietnam from 2016 to 2021
Le LKT , Chu MNT , Tate JE , Jiang B , Bowen MD , Esona MD , Gautam R , Jaimes J , Pham TPT , Nguyen HT , Anh DD , Trang NV , Parashar U . Infect Genet Evol 2024 105566 Rotavirus group A (RVA) is the most common cause of severe childhood diarrhea worldwide. The introduction of rotavirus vaccination programs has contributed to a reduction in hospitalizations and mortality caused by RVA. From 2016 to 21, we conducted surveillance to monitor RVA prevalence and genotype distribution in Nam Dinh and Thua Thien Hue (TT Hue) provinces where a pilot Rotavin-M1 vaccine (Vietnam) implementation took place from 2017 to 20. Out of 6626 stool samples, RVA was detected in 2164 (32.6%) by ELISA. RT-PCR using type-specific primers were used to determine the G and P genotypes of RVA-positive specimens. Whole genome sequences of a subset of 52 specimens randomly selected from 2016 to 21 were mapped using next-generation sequencing. From 2016 to 21, the G9, G3 and G8 strains dominated, with detected frequencies of 39%, 23%, and 19%, respectively; of which, the most common genotypes identified were G9P[8], G3P[8] and G8P[8]. G1 strains re-emerged in Nam Dinh and TT Hue (29.5% and 11.9%, respectively) from 2020 to 2021. G3 prevalence decreased from 74% to 20% in TT Hue and from 21% to 13% in Nam Dinh province between 2017 and 2021. The G3 strains consisted of 52% human typical G3 (hG3) and 47% equine-like G3 (eG3). Full genome analysis showed substantial diversity among the circulating G3 strains with different backgrounds relating to equine and feline viruses. G9 prevalence decreased sharply from 2016 to 2021 in both provinces. G8 strains peaked during 2019-2020 in Nam Dinh and TT Hue provinces (68% and 46%, respectively). Most G8 and G9 strains had no genetic differences over the surveillance period with very high nucleotide similarities of 99.2-99.9% and 99.1-99.7%, respectively. The G1 strains were not derived from the RVA vaccine. Changes in the genotype distribution and substantial diversity among circulating strains were detected throughout the surveillance period and differed between the two provinces. Determining vaccine effectiveness against circulating strains over time will be important to ensure that observed changes are due to natural secular variation and not from vaccine pressure. |
Utilizing a university testing program to estimate relative effectiveness of monovalent COVID-19 mRNA booster vaccine versus two-dose primary series against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection
Bennett JC , Luiten KG , O'Hanlon J , Han PD , McDonald D , Wright T , Wolf CR , Lo NK , Acker Z , Regelbrugge L , McCaffrey KM , Pfau B , Stone J , Schwabe-Fry K , Lockwood CM , Guthrie BL , Gottlieb GS , Englund JA , Uyeki TM , Carone M , Starita LM , Weil AA , Chu HY . Vaccine 2024 Vaccine effectiveness (VE) studies utilizing the test-negative design are typically conducted in clinical settings, rather than community populations, leading to bias in VE estimates against mild disease and limited information on VE in healthy young adults. In a community-based university population, we utilized data from a large SARS-CoV-2 testing program to estimate relative VE of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine primary series and monovalent booster dose versus primary series only against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection from September 2021 to July 2022. We used the test-negative design and logistic regression implemented via generalized estimating equations adjusted for age, calendar time, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, and testing frequency (proxy for test-seeking behavior) to estimate relative VE. Analyses included 2,218 test-positive cases (59 % received monovalent booster dose) and 9,615 test-negative controls (62 %) from 9,066 individuals, with median age of 21 years, mostly students (71 %), White (56 %) or Asian (28 %), and with few comorbidities (3 %). More cases (23 %) than controls (6 %) had COVID-19-like illness. Estimated adjusted relative VE of primary series and monovalent booster dose versus primary series only against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection was 40 % (95 % CI: 33-47 %) during the overall analysis period and 46 % (39-52 %) during the period of Omicron circulation. Relative VE was greater for those without versus those with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (41 %, 34-48 % versus 33 %, 9 %-52 %, P < 0.001). Relative VE was also greater in the six months after receiving a booster dose (41 %, 33-47 %) compared to more than six months (27 %, 8-42 %), but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.06). In this relatively young and healthy adult population, an mRNA monovalent booster dose provided increased protection against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, overall and with the Omicron variant. University testing programs may be utilized for estimating VE in healthy young adults, a population that is not well-represented by routine VE studies. |
Effectiveness of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in preventing SARS-cov-2 infection in children and adolescents aged 5 to 17 years
Feldstein LR , Britton A , Grant L , Wiegand R , Ruffin J , Babu TM , Briggs Hagen M , Burgess JL , Caban-Martinez AJ , Chu HY , Ellingson KD , Englund JA , Hegmann KT , Jeddy Z , Lauring AS , Lutrick K , Martin ET , Mathenge C , Meece J , Midgley CM , Monto AS , Newes-Adeyi G , Odame-Bamfo L , Olsho LEW , Phillips AL , Rai RP , Saydah S , Smith N , Steinhardt L , Tyner H , Vandermeer M , Vaughan M , Yoon SK , Gaglani M , Naleway AL . Jama 2024 331 (5) 408-416 IMPORTANCE: Bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were recommended in the US for children and adolescents aged 12 years or older on September 1, 2022, and for children aged 5 to 11 years on October 12, 2022; however, data demonstrating the effectiveness of bivalent COVID-19 vaccines are limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of bivalent COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic COVID-19 among children and adolescents. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data for the period September 4, 2022, to January 31, 2023, were combined from 3 prospective US cohort studies (6 sites total) and used to estimate COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness among children and adolescents aged 5 to 17 years. A total of 2959 participants completed periodic surveys (demographics, household characteristics, chronic medical conditions, and COVID-19 symptoms) and submitted weekly self-collected nasal swabs (irrespective of symptoms); participants submitted additional nasal swabs at the onset of any symptoms. EXPOSURE: Vaccination status was captured from the periodic surveys and supplemented with data from state immunization information systems and electronic medical records. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Respiratory swabs were tested for the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. SARS-CoV-2 infection was defined as a positive test regardless of symptoms. Symptomatic COVID-19 was defined as a positive test and 2 or more COVID-19 symptoms within 7 days of specimen collection. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios for SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic COVID-19 among participants who received a bivalent COVID-19 vaccine dose vs participants who received no vaccine or monovalent vaccine doses only. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race, ethnicity, underlying health conditions, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection status, geographic site, proportion of circulating variants by site, and local virus prevalence. RESULTS: Of the 2959 participants (47.8% were female; median age, 10.6 years [IQR, 8.0-13.2 years]; 64.6% were non-Hispanic White) included in this analysis, 25.4% received a bivalent COVID-19 vaccine dose. During the study period, 426 participants (14.4%) had laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among these 426 participants, 184 (43.2%) had symptomatic COVID-19, 383 (89.9%) were not vaccinated or had received only monovalent COVID-19 vaccine doses (1.38 SARS-CoV-2 infections per 1000 person-days), and 43 (10.1%) had received a bivalent COVID-19 vaccine dose (0.84 SARS-CoV-2 infections per 1000 person-days). Bivalent vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection was 54.0% (95% CI, 36.6%-69.1%) and vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic COVID-19 was 49.4% (95% CI, 22.2%-70.7%). The median observation time after vaccination was 276 days (IQR, 142-350 days) for participants who received only monovalent COVID-19 vaccine doses vs 50 days (IQR, 27-74 days) for those who received a bivalent COVID-19 vaccine dose. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The bivalent COVID-19 vaccines protected children and adolescents against SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic COVID-19. These data demonstrate the benefit of COVID-19 vaccine in children and adolescents. All eligible children and adolescents should remain up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccinations. |
Concurrent transmission of multiple carbapenemases in a long-term acute-care hospital
Rankin DA , Walters MS , Caicedo L , Gable P , Moulton-Meissner HA , Chan A , Burks A , Edwards K , McAllister G , Kent A , Laufer Halpin A , Moore C , McLemore T , Thomas L , Dotson NQ , Chu AK . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2024 1-10 OBJECTIVE: We investigated concurrent outbreaks of Pseudomonas aeruginosa carrying bla(VIM) (VIM-CRPA) and Enterobacterales carrying bla(KPC) (KPC-CRE) at a long-term acute-care hospital (LTACH A). METHODS: We defined an incident case as the first detection of bla(KPC) or bla(VIM) from a patient's clinical cultures or colonization screening test. We reviewed medical records and performed infection control assessments, colonization screening, environmental sampling, and molecular characterization of carbapenemase-producing organisms from clinical and environmental sources by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and whole-genome sequencing. RESULTS: From July 2017 to December 2018, 76 incident cases were identified from 69 case patients: 51 had bla(KPC,) 11 had bla(VIM,) and 7 had bla(VIM) and bla(KPC). Also, bla(KPC) were identified from 7 Enterobacterales, and all bla(VIM) were P. aeruginosa. We observed gaps in hand hygiene, and we recovered KPC-CRE and VIM-CRPA from drains and toilets. We identified 4 KPC alleles and 2 VIM alleles; 2 KPC alleles were located on plasmids that were identified across multiple Enterobacterales and in both clinical and environmental isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Our response to a single patient colonized with VIM-CRPA and KPC-CRE identified concurrent CPO outbreaks at LTACH A. Epidemiologic and genomic investigations indicated that the observed diversity was due to a combination of multiple introductions of VIM-CRPA and KPC-CRE and to the transfer of carbapenemase genes across different bacteria species and strains. Improved infection control, including interventions that minimized potential spread from wastewater premise plumbing, stopped transmission. |
Tropical data: Approach and methodology as applied to trachoma prevalence surveys
Harding-Esch EM , Burgert-Brucker CR , Jimenez C , Bakhtiari A , Willis R , Bejiga MD , Mpyet C , Ngondi J , Boyd S , Abdala M , Abdou A , Adamu Y , Alemayehu A , Alemayehu W , Al-Khatib T , Apadinuwe SC , Awaca N , Awoussi MS , Baayendag G , Badiane MD , Bailey RL , Batcho W , Bay Z , Bella A , Beido N , Bol YY , Bougouma C , Brady CJ , Bucumi V , Butcher R , Cakacaka R , Cama A , Camara M , Cassama E , Chaora SG , Chebbi AC , Chisambi AB , Chu B , Conteh A , Coulibaly SM , Courtright P , Dalmar A , Dat TM , Davids T , Djaker MEA , de Fátima Costa Lopes M , Dézoumbé D , Dodson S , Downs P , Eckman S , Elshafie BE , Elmezoghi M , Elvis AA , Emerson P , Epée EE , Faktaufon D , Fall M , Fassinou A , Fleming F , Flueckiger R , Gamael KK , Garae M , Garap J , Gass K , Gebru G , Gichangi MM , Giorgi E , Goépogui A , Gómez DVF , Gómez Forero DP , Gower EW , Harte A , Henry R , Honorio-Morales HA , Ilako DR , Issifou AAB , Jones E , Kabona G , Kabore M , Kadri B , Kalua K , Kanyi SK , Kebede S , Kebede F , Keenan JD , Kello AB , Khan AA , Khelifi H , Kilangalanga J , Kim SH , Ko R , Lewallen S , Lietman T , Logora MSY , Lopez YA , MacArthur C , Macleod C , Makangila F , Mariko B , Martin DL , Masika M , Massae P , Massangaie M , Matendechero HS , Mathewos T , McCullagh S , Meite A , Mendes EP , Abdi HM , Miller H , Minnih A , Mishra SK , Molefi T , Mosher A , M'Po N , Mugume F , Mukwiza R , Mwale C , Mwatha S , Mwingira U , Nash SD , Nassa C , Negussu N , Nieba C , Noah Noah JC , Nwosu CO , Olobio N , Opon R , Pavluck A , Phiri I , Rainima-Qaniuci M , Renneker KK , Saboyá-Díaz MI , Sakho F , Sanha S , Sarah V , Sarr B , Szwarcwald CL , Shah Salam A , Sharma S , Seife F , Serrano Chavez GM , Sissoko M , Sitoe HM , Sokana O , Tadesse F , Taleo F , Talero SL , Tarfani Y , Tefera A , Tekeraoi R , Tesfazion A , Traina A , Traoré L , Trujillo-Trujillo J , Tukahebwa EM , Vashist P , Wanyama EB , Warusavithana SDP , Watitu TK , West S , Win Y , Woods G , Yajima A , Yaya G , Zecarias A , Zewengiel S , Zoumanigui A , Hooper PJ , Millar T , Rotondo L , Solomon AW . Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2023 30 (6) 544-560 PURPOSE: Population-based prevalence surveys are essential for decision-making on interventions to achieve trachoma elimination as a public health problem. This paper outlines the methodologies of Tropical Data, which supports work to undertake those surveys. METHODS: Tropical Data is a consortium of partners that supports health ministries worldwide to conduct globally standardised prevalence surveys that conform to World Health Organization recommendations. Founding principles are health ministry ownership, partnership and collaboration, and quality assurance and quality control at every step of the survey process. Support covers survey planning, survey design, training, electronic data collection and fieldwork, and data management, analysis and dissemination. Methods are adapted to meet local context and needs. Customisations, operational research and integration of other diseases into routine trachoma surveys have also been supported. RESULTS: Between 29(th) February 2016 and 24(th) April 2023, 3373 trachoma surveys across 50 countries have been supported, resulting in 10,818,502 people being examined for trachoma. CONCLUSION: This health ministry-led, standardised approach, with support from the start to the end of the survey process, has helped all trachoma elimination stakeholders to know where interventions are needed, where interventions can be stopped, and when elimination as a public health problem has been achieved. Flexibility to meet specific country contexts, adaptation to changes in global guidance and adjustments in response to user feedback have facilitated innovation in evidence-based methodologies, and supported health ministries to strive for global disease control targets. |
Burden of respiratory syncytial virus-associated acute respiratory infections during pregnancy
Kenmoe S , Chu HY , Dawood FS , Milucky J , Kittikraisak W , Matthewson H , Kulkarni D , Suntarattiwong P , Frivold C , Mohanty S , Havers F , Li Y , Nair H . J Infect Dis 2023 INTRODUCTION: With the licensure of maternal RSV vaccines in Europe and USA, data are needed to better characterize the burden of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated acute respiratory infections (ARI) in pregnancy. This study aims to determine among pregnant individuals the proportion of ARI testing positive for RSV and RSV incidence rate, RSV-associated hospitalizations, deaths, and perinatal outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines using five databases (Medline, Embase, Global Health, Web of Science and Global Index Medicus) and included additional unpublished data. Pregnant individuals with respiratory infections who had respiratory samples tested for RSV were included. We used a random-effects meta-analysis to generate overall proportions and rate estimates across studies. RESULTS: Eleven studies with pregnant individuals recruited between 2010 and 2022 were identified, most of which recruited pregnant individuals in community, inpatient and outpatient settings. Among 8126 pregnant individuals, the proportion with respiratory infections that tested positive for RSV ranged from 0.9% to 10.7%, with a meta-estimate of 3.4% (95% CI: 1.9; 54). The pooled incidence rate of RSV infection episodes among pregnant individuals was 26.0 (15.8; 36.2) per 1000 person-years. RSV hospitalization rates reported in two studies were 2.4 and 3.0 per 1000 person-years. Of five studies that ascertained RSV-associated deaths among 4708 pregnant individuals, no deaths were reported. Three studies comparing RSV-positive and RSV-negative pregnant individuals found no difference in odds of miscarriage, stillbirth, low birth weight, and small for gestational age. RSV-positive pregnant individuals had higher odds of preterm delivery (odds ratio 3.6 [1.3; 10.3]). CONCLUSION: Data on RSV-associated hospitalization incidence rates are limited but available estimates are lower than those reported in older adults and young children. As countries debate whether to include RSV vaccines in maternal vaccination programs, which are primarily intended to protect infants, this information could be useful in shaping vaccine policy decisions. |
Effect of primaquine dose on the risk of recurrence in patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium vivax: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis
Commons RJ , Rajasekhar M , Edler P , Abreha T , Awab GR , Baird JK , Barber BE , Chu CS , Cui L , Daher A , Gonzalez-Ceron L , Grigg MJ , Hwang J , Karunajeewa H , Lacerda MVG , Ladeia-Andrade S , Lidia K , Llanos-Cuentas A , Longley RJ , Pereira DB , Pasaribu AP , Pukrittayakamee S , Rijal KR , Sutanto I , Taylor WRJ , Thanh PV , Thriemer K , Vieira JLF , Watson JA , Zuluaga-Idarraga LM , White NJ , Guerin PJ , Simpson JA , Price RN . Lancet Infect Dis 2023 BACKGROUND: Primaquine is used to eliminate Plasmodium vivax hypnozoites, but its optimal dosing regimen remains unclear. We undertook a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of different primaquine dosing regimens to prevent P vivax recurrence. METHODS: For this systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Central for prospective clinical studies of uncomplicated P vivax from endemic countries published between Jan 1, 2000, and June 8, 2023. We included studies if they had active follow-up of at least 28 days, and if they included a treatment group with daily primaquine given over multiple days, where primaquine was commenced within 7 days of schizontocidal treatment and was given alone or coadministered with chloroquine or one of four artemisinin-based combination therapies (ie, artemether-lumefantrine, artesunate-mefloquine, artesunate-amodiaquine, or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine). We excluded studies if they were on prevention, prophylaxis, or patients with severe malaria, or if data were extracted retrospectively from medical records outside of a planned trial. For the meta-analysis, we contacted the investigators of eligible trials to request individual patient data and we then pooled data that were made available by Aug 23, 2021. We assessed the effects of total dose and duration of primaquine regimens on the rate of first P vivax recurrence between day 7 and day 180 by Cox's proportional hazards regression (efficacy analysis). The effect of primaquine daily dose on gastrointestinal symptoms on days 5-7 was assessed by modified Poisson regression (tolerability analysis). The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019154470. FINDINGS: Of 226 identified studies, 23 studies with patient-level data from 6879 patients from 16 countries were included in the efficacy analysis. At day 180, the risk of recurrence was 51·0% (95% CI 48·2-53·9) in 1470 patients treated without primaquine, 19·3% (16·9-21·9) in 2569 patients treated with a low total dose of primaquine (approximately 3·5 mg/kg), and 8·1% (7·0-9·4) in 2811 patients treated with a high total dose of primaquine (approximately 7 mg/kg), regardless of primaquine treatment duration. Compared with treatment without primaquine, the rate of P vivax recurrence was lower after treatment with low-dose primaquine (adjusted hazard ratio 0·21, 95% CI 0·17-0·27; p<0·0001) and high-dose primaquine (0·10, 0·08-0·12; p<0·0001). High-dose primaquine had greater efficacy than low-dose primaquine in regions with high and low relapse periodicity (ie, the time from initial infection to vivax relapse). 16 studies with patient-level data from 5609 patients from ten countries were included in the tolerability analysis. Gastrointestinal symptoms on days 5-7 were reported by 4·0% (95% CI 0·0-8·7) of 893 patients treated without primaquine, 6·2% (0·5-12·0) of 737 patients treated with a low daily dose of primaquine (approximately 0·25 mg/kg per day), 5·9% (1·8-10·1) of 1123 patients treated with an intermediate daily dose (approximately 0·5 mg/kg per day) and 10·9% (5·7-16·1) of 1178 patients treated with a high daily dose (approximately 1 mg/kg per day). 20 of 23 studies included in the efficacy analysis and 15 of 16 in the tolerability analysis had a low or unclear risk of bias. INTERPRETATION: Increasing the total dose of primaquine from 3·5 mg/kg to 7 mg/kg can reduce P vivax recurrences by more than 50% in most endemic regions, with a small associated increase in gastrointestinal symptoms. FUNDING: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and Medicines for Malaria Venture. |
Effect of adherence to primaquine on the risk of Plasmodium vivax recurrence: a WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis
Mehdipour P , Rajasekhar M , Dini S , Zaloumis S , Abreha T , Adam I , Awab GR , Baird JK , Brasil LW , Chu CS , Cui L , Daher A , do Socorro MGomes M , Gonzalez-Ceron L , Hwang J , Karunajeewa H , Lacerda MVG , Ladeia-Andrade S , Leslie T , Ley B , Lidia K , Llanos-Cuentas A , Longley RJ , Monteiro WM , Pereira DB , Rijal KR , Saravu K , Sutanto I , Taylor WRJ , Thanh PV , Thriemer K , Vieira JLF , White NJ , Zuluaga-Idarraga LM , Guerin PJ , Price RN , Simpson JA , Commons RJ . Malar J 2023 22 (1) 306 BACKGROUND: Imperfect adherence is a major barrier to effective primaquine radical cure of Plasmodium vivax. This study investigated the effect of reduced adherence on the risk of P. vivax recurrence. METHODS: Efficacy studies of patients with uncomplicated P. vivax malaria, including a treatment arm with daily primaquine, published between January 1999 and March 2020 were identified. Individual patient data from eligible studies were pooled using standardized methodology. Adherence to primaquine was inferred from i) the percentage of supervised doses and ii) the total mg/kg dose received compared to the target total mg/kg dose per protocol. The effect of adherence to primaquine on the incidence of P. vivax recurrence between days 7 and 90 was investigated by Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 82 eligible studies, 32 were available including 6917 patients from 18 countries. For adherence assessed by percentage of supervised primaquine, 2790 patients (40.3%) had poor adherence (≤ 50%) and 4127 (59.7%) had complete adherence. The risk of recurrence by day 90 was 14.0% [95% confidence interval: 12.1-16.1] in patients with poor adherence compared to 5.8% [5.0-6.7] following full adherence; p = 0.014. After controlling for age, sex, baseline parasitaemia, and total primaquine dose per protocol, the rate of the first recurrence was higher following poor adherence compared to patients with full adherence (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 2.3 [1.8-2.9]). When adherence was quantified by total mg/kg dose received among 3706 patients, 347 (9.4%) had poor adherence, 88 (2.4%) had moderate adherence, and 3271 (88.2%) had complete adherence to treatment. The risks of recurrence by day 90 were 8.2% [4.3-15.2] in patients with poor adherence and 4.9% [4.1-5.8] in patients with full adherence; p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Reduced adherence, including less supervision, increases the risk of vivax recurrence. |
Primaquine dose and the risk of haemolysis in patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium vivax malaria: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis
Rajasekhar M , Simpson JA , Ley B , Edler P , Chu CS , Abreha T , Awab GR , Baird JK , Bancone G , Barber BE , Grigg MJ , Hwang J , Karunajeewa H , Lacerda MVG , Ladeia-Andrade S , Llanos-Cuentas A , Pukrittayakamee S , Rijal KR , Saravu K , Sutanto I , Taylor WRJ , Thriemer K , Watson JA , Guerin PJ , White NJ , Price RN , Commons RJ . Lancet Infect Dis 2023 BACKGROUND: Primaquine radical cure is used to treat dormant liver-stage parasites and prevent relapsing Plasmodium vivax malaria but is limited by concerns of haemolysis. We undertook a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis to investigate the haematological safety of different primaquine regimens for P vivax radical cure. METHODS: For this systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Central for prospective clinical studies of uncomplicated P vivax from endemic countries published between Jan 1, 2000, and June 8, 2023. We included studies if they had active follow-up of at least 28 days, if they included a treatment group with daily primaquine given over multiple days where primaquine was commenced within 3 days of schizontocidal treatment and was given alone or coadministered with chloroquine or one of four artemisinin-based combination therapies (ie, artemether-lumefantrine, artesunate-mefloquine, artesunate-amodiaquine, or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine), and if they recorded haemoglobin or haematocrit concentrations on day 0. We excluded studies if they were on prevention, prophylaxis, or patients with severe malaria, or if data were extracted retrospectively from medical records outside of a planned trial. For the meta-analysis, we contacted the investigators of eligible trials to request individual patient data and we then pooled data that were made available by Aug 23, 2021. The main outcome was haemoglobin reduction of more than 25% to a concentration of less than 7 g/dL by day 14. Haemoglobin concentration changes between day 0 and days 2-3 and between day 0 and days 5-7 were assessed by mixed-effects linear regression for patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) activity of (1) 30% or higher and (2) between 30% and less than 70%. The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019154470 and CRD42022303680. FINDINGS: Of 226 identified studies, 18 studies with patient-level data from 5462 patients from 15 countries were included in the analysis. A haemoglobin reduction of more than 25% to a concentration of less than 7 g/dL occurred in one (0·1%) of 1208 patients treated without primaquine, none of 893 patients treated with a low daily dose of primaquine (<0·375 mg/kg per day), five (0·3%) of 1464 patients treated with an intermediate daily dose (0·375 mg/kg per day to <0·75 mg/kg per day), and six (0·5%) of 1269 patients treated with a high daily dose (≥0·75 mg/kg per day). The covariate-adjusted mean estimated haemoglobin changes at days 2-3 were -0·6 g/dL (95% CI -0·7 to -0·5), -0·7 g/dL (-0·8 to -0·5), -0·6 g/dL (-0·7 to -0·4), and -0·5 g/dL (-0·7 to -0·4), respectively. In 51 patients with G6PD activity between 30% and less than 70%, the adjusted mean haemoglobin concentration on days 2-3 decreased as G6PD activity decreased; two patients in this group who were treated with a high daily dose of primaquine had a reduction of more than 25% to a concentration of less than 7 g/dL. 17 of 18 included studies had a low or unclear risk of bias. INTERPRETATION: Treatment of patients with G6PD activity of 30% or higher with 0·25-0·5 mg/kg per day primaquine regimens and patients with G6PD activity of 70% or higher with 0·25-1 mg/kg per day regimens were associated with similar risks of haemolysis to those in patients treated without primaquine, supporting the safe use of primaquine radical cure at these doses. FUNDING: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and Medicines for Malaria Venture. |
Risk of subsequent respiratory virus detection after primary virus detection in a community household study - King County, Washington 2019-2021
Heimonen J , Chow EJ , Wang Y , Hughes JP , Rogers J , Emanuels A , O'Hanlon J , Han PD , Wolf CR , Logue JK , Ogokeh CE , Rolfes MA , Uyeki TM , Starita L , Englund JA , Chu HY . J Infect Dis 2023 BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of respiratory viral infections is complex. How infection with one respiratory virus affects risk of subsequent infection with the same or another respiratory virus is not well described. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from a longitudinal household cohort study from October 2019-June 2021. Enrolled households completed active surveillance for acute respiratory illness (ARI), and participants with ARI self-collected nasal swabs; after April 2020, participants with ARI or laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 and their household members self-collected nasal swabs. Specimens were tested via multiplex RT-PCR for respiratory viruses. A Cox regression model with a time-dependent covariate examined risk of subsequent detections following a specific primary viral detection. RESULTS: Rhinovirus was the most frequently detected pathogen in study specimens (n=406, 9.5%). Among 51 participants with multiple viral detections, rhinovirus to seasonal coronavirus (8, 14.8%) was the most common viral detection pairing. Relative to no primary detection, there was a 1.03-2.06-fold increase in risk of subsequent virus detection in the 90 days following primary detection; risk varied by primary virus: parainfluenza, rhinovirus, and respiratory syncytial virus were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Primary virus detection was associated with higher risk of subsequent virus detection within the first 90 days after primary detection. |
The Seattle Flu Study: a multi-arm community-based prospective study protocol for assessing influenza prevalence, transmission, and genomic epidemiology (preprint)
Chu HY , Boeckh M , Englund JA , Famulare M , Lutz B , Nickerson DA , Rieder M , Starita LM , Shendure J , Bedford T , Adler A , Brandstetter E , Frazer CD , Han PD , Gulati RK , Hadfield J , Jackson M , Kiavand A , Kimball LE , Lacombe K , Logue JK , Lyon VR , Newman KL , Sibley TR , Zigman Suchsland M , Wolf C . medRxiv 2020 2020.03.02.20029595 Introduction Influenza epidemics and pandemics cause significant morbidity and mortality. An effective response to a potential pandemic requires the infrastructure to rapidly detect, characterize, and potentially contain new and emerging influenza strains at a population level. The objective of this study is to use data gathered simultaneously from community and hospital sites to develop a model of how influenza enters and spreads in a population.Methods and Analysis Starting in the 2018-19 season, we have been enrolling individuals with acute respiratory illness from community sites throughout the Seattle metropolitan area, including clinics, childcare facilities, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, workplaces, college campuses, and homeless shelters. At these sites, we collect clinical data and mid-nasal swabs from individuals with at least two acute respiratory symptoms. Additionally, we collect residual nasal swabs and data from individuals who seek care for respiratory symptoms at four regional hospitals. Samples are tested using a multiplex molecular assay, and influenza whole genome sequencing is performed for samples with influenza detected. Geospatial mapping and computational modeling platforms are in development to characterize the regional spread of influenza and other respiratory pathogens.Ethics and Dissemination The study was approved by the University of Washington’s Institutional Review Board. Results will be disseminated through talks at conferences, peer-reviewed publications, and on the study website (www.seattleflu.org).Strengths and limitations of this study- Large-scale multiple-arm study of respiratory illness characterization with collection of samples from individuals in the community as well as in ambulatory care and hospital settings- Integration of sociodemographic, clinical, and geospatial data on a regional level- Multiplex molecular testing for multiple viral and bacterial pathogens and whole genome sequencing of influenza for detailed molecular epidemiologic characterization and transmission mapping- Geographically and socioeconomically diverse sampling of community-based acute respiratory illnessesCompeting Interest StatementAmanda Adler, Elisabeth Brandstetter, Michael Famulare, Chris D. Frazar, Peter D. Han, Reena K. Gulati, James Hadfield, Michael L. Jackson, Anahita Kiavand, Louise E. Kimball, Kirsten Lacombe, Jennifer Logue, Victoria Lyon, Kira L. Newman, Thomas R. Sibley, Jay Shendure, Lea Starita, Monica L. Zigman Suchsland, and Caitlin Wolf declare no competing interests. Helen Y Chu receives research support from Sanofi, Cepheid, and Genentech/Roche and is a consultant for Merck. Janet Englund receives research support to her institution from Astrazeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Novavax and is a consultant for Sanofi Pasteur and Meissa Vaccines.Funding StatementThe Seattle Flu Study is funded through the Brotman Baty Institute. The funder was not involved in the design of the study, does not have any ownership over the management and conduct of the study, the data, or the rights to publishAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable YesThe data will be accessed only by authorized individuals on the study team. Access to deidentified, aggregated data and analysis code will be publicly available on the study web page (www.seattleflu.org). http://www.seattleflu.org |
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Seattle, Washington—October 2019–April 2020 (preprint)
McCulloch DJ , Jackson ML , Hughes JP , Lester S , Mills L , Freeman B , Rasheed MAU , Thornburg NJ , Chu HY . medRxiv 2020 2020.12.07.20244103 Estimating prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies is important to determine disease burden. We tested residual samples from 763 Seattle-area adults for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Prevalence rose from 0% to 1.2% between October 2019–April 2020, suggesting a small percentage of this metropolitan-area cohort had been infected with SARS-CoV-2 at that time.Competing Interest StatementHelen Y. Chu receives research support from Cepheid and is a consultant for Merck, Pfizer, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and Ellume. Michael L. Jackson receives research funding from Sanofi Pasteur. Denise J. McCulloch, James P. Hughes, Sandra Lester, Lisa Mills, Brandi Freeman, Mohammad Ata Ut Rasheed, and Natalie J. Thornburg, declare no competing interests.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the University of Washington Department of Medicine Scholars Award to Helen Chu.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of Washington IRBAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. |
Enhanced Contact Investigations for Nine Early Travel-Related Cases of SARS-CoV-2 in the United States (preprint)
Burke RM , Balter S , Barnes E , Barry V , Bartlett K , Beer KD , Benowitz I , Biggs HM , Bruce H , Bryant-Genevier J , Cates J , Chatham-Stephens K , Chea N , Chiou H , Christiansen D , Chu VT , Clark S , Cody SH , Cohen M , Conners EE , Dasari V , Dawson P , DeSalvo T , Donahue M , Dratch A , Duca L , Duchin J , Dyal JW , Feldstein LR , Fenstersheib M , Fischer M , Fisher R , Foo C , Freeman-Ponder B , Fry AM , Gant J , Gautom R , Ghinai I , Gounder P , Grigg CT , Gunzenhauser J , Hall AJ , Han GS , Haupt T , Holshue M , Hunter J , Ibrahim MB , Jacobs MW , Jarashow MC , Joshi K , Kamali T , Kawakami V , Kim M , Kirking HL , Kita-Yarbro A , Klos R , Kobayashi M , Kocharian A , Lang M , Layden J , Leidman E , Lindquist S , Lindstrom S , Link-Gelles R , Marlow M , Mattison CP , McClung N , McPherson TD , Mello L , Midgley CM , Novosad S , Patel MT , Pettrone K , Pillai SK , Pray IW , Reese HE , Rhodes H , Robinson S , Rolfes M , Routh J , Rubin R , Rudman SL , Russell D , Scott S , Shetty V , Smith-Jeffcoat SE , Soda EA , Spitters C , Stierman B , Sunenshine R , Terashita D , Traub E , Vahey GM , Verani JR , Wallace M , Westercamp M , Wortham J , Xie A , Yousaf A , Zahn M . medRxiv 2020 2020.04.27.20081901 Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the respiratory disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was first identified in Wuhan, China and has since become pandemic. As part of initial response activities in the United States, enhanced contact investigations were conducted to enable early identification and isolation of additional cases and to learn more about risk factors for transmission.Methods Close contacts of nine early travel-related cases in the United States were identified. Close contacts meeting criteria for active monitoring were followed, and selected individuals were targeted for collection of additional exposure details and respiratory samples. Respiratory samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Results There were 404 close contacts who underwent active monitoring in the response jurisdictions; 338 had at least basic exposure data, of whom 159 had ≥1 set of respiratory samples collected and tested. Across all known close contacts under monitoring, two additional cases were identified; both secondary cases were in spouses of travel-associated case patients. The secondary attack rate among household members, all of whom had ≥1 respiratory sample tested, was 13% (95% CI: 4 – 38%).Conclusions The enhanced contact tracing investigations undertaken around nine early travel-related cases of COVID-19 in the United States identified two cases of secondary transmission, both spouses. Rapid detection and isolation of the travel-associated case patients, enabled by public awareness of COVID-19 among travelers from China, may have mitigated transmission risk among close contacts of these cases.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was sought or received.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData may be available upon reasonable request. |
A Remote Household-Based Approach to Influenza Self-Testing and Antiviral Treatment (preprint)
Heimonen J , McCulloch DJ , O'Hanlon J , Kim AE , Emanuels A , Wilcox N , Brandstetter E , Stewart M , McCune D , Fry S , Parsons S , Hughes JP , Jackson ML , Uyeki TM , Boeckh M , Starita LM , Bedford T , Englund JA , Chu HY . medRxiv 2021 2021.02.01.21250973 Background Households represent important settings for transmission of influenza and other respiratory viruses. Current influenza diagnosis and treatment relies upon patient visits to healthcare facilities, which may lead to under-diagnosis and treatment delays. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of an at-home approach to influenza diagnosis and treatment via home testing, telehealth care, and rapid antiviral home delivery.Methods We conducted a pilot interventional study of remote influenza diagnosis and treatment in Seattle-area households with children during the 2019-2020 influenza season using pre-positioned nasal swabs and home influenza tests. Home monitoring for respiratory symptoms occurred weekly; if symptoms were reported within 48 hours of onset, participants collected mid-nasal swabs and used a rapid home-based influenza immunoassay. An additional home-collected swab was returned to a laboratory for confirmatory influenza RT-PCR testing. Baloxavir antiviral treatment was prescribed and delivered to symptomatic and age-eligible participants, following a telehealth encounter.Results 124 households comprising 481 individuals self-monitored for respiratory symptoms, with 58 home tests administered. 12 home tests were positive for influenza, of which 8 were true positives confirmed by RT-PCR. The sensitivity and specificity of the home influenza test was 72.7% and 96.2%, respectively. There were 8 home deliveries of baloxavir, with 7 (87.5%) occurring within 3 hours of prescription, and all within 48 hours of symptom onset.Conclusions We demonstrate the feasibility of self-testing combined with rapid home delivery of influenza antiviral treatment. This approach may be an important control strategy for influenza epidemics and pandemics.Summary In this pilot study, 481 individuals self-monitored for respiratory symptoms. Of 58 home tests, 12 were influenza-positive. There were 8 baloxavir home deliveries within 48 hours of illness onset. A home-based approach to influenza diagnosis and treatment could be feasible.Competing Interest StatementH.Y.C. has received research support from GlaxoSmithKline, Novavax, and Sanofi Pasteur; J.A.E. has received research support from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKine, Merck, and Pfizer and served as a consultant for Sanofi Pasteur and Meissa Vaccines. M.L.J. has received research support from Sanofi Pasteur. M.B. receives research support and serves as a consultant for Ansun Biopharma, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, and Vir Biotechnology; and serves as a consultant to GlaxoSmithKline, ReViral, ADMA, Pulmocdie and ModernaClinical TrialNCT04141930Funding StatementThe Seattle Flu Study is funded by Gates Ventures. The funder was not involved in the design of the study, does not have any ownership over the management and conduct of the study, the data, or the rights to publish.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of Washington Institutional Review Board (STUDY00008200)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData and code used for analyses may be available upon request. |
One Health Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Seropositivity among Pets in Households with Confirmed Human COVID-19 Cases — Utah and Wisconsin, 2020 (preprint)
Goryoka GW , Cossaboom CM , Gharpure R , Dawson P , Tansey C , Rossow J , Mrotz V , Rooney J , Torchetti M , Loiacono CM , Killian ML , Jenkins-Moore M , Lim A , Poulsen K , Christensen D , Sweet E , Peterson D , Sangster AL , Young EL , Oakeson KF , Taylor D , Price A , Kiphibane T , Klos R , Konkle D , Bhattacharyya S , Dasu T , Chu VT , Lewis NM , Queen K , Zhang J , Uehara A , Dietrich EA , Tong S , Kirking HL , Doty JB , Murrell LS , Spengler JR , Straily A , Wallace R , Barton Behravesh C . bioRxiv 2021 2021.04.11.439379 Background Approximately 67% of U.S. households have pets. Limited data are available on SARS-CoV-2 in pets. We assessed SARS-CoV-2 infection in pet cohabitants as a sub-study of an ongoing COVID-19 household transmission investigation.Methods Mammalian pets from households with ≥1 person with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were eligible for inclusion from April–May 2020. Demographic/exposure information, oropharyngeal, nasal, rectal, and fur swabs, feces, and blood were collected from enrolled pets and tested by rRT-PCR and virus neutralization assays.Findings We enrolled 37 dogs and 19 cats from 34 of 41 eligible households. All oropharyngeal, nasal, and rectal swabs tested negative by rRT-PCR; one dog’s fur swabs (2%) tested positive by rRT-PCR at the first animal sampling. Among 47 pets with serological results from 30 households, eight (17%) pets (4 dogs, 4 cats) from 6 (20%) households had detectable SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies. In households with a seropositive pet, the proportion of people with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 was greater (median 79%; range: 40–100%) compared to households with no seropositive pet (median 37%; range: 13–100%) (p=0.01). Thirty-three pets with serologic results had frequent daily contact (≥1 hour) with the human index patient before the person’s COVID-19 diagnosis. Of these 33 pets, 14 (42%) had decreased contact with the human index patient after diagnosis and none (0%) were seropositive; of the 19 (58%) pets with continued contact, 4 (21%) were seropositive.Interpretations Seropositive pets likely acquired infection from humans, which may occur more frequently than previously recognized. People with COVID-19 should restrict contact with animals.Funding Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of AgricultureCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest. |
Addressing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Decontamination: Methylene Blue and Light Inactivates SARS-CoV-2 on N95 Respirators and Masks with Maintenance of Integrity and Fit (preprint)
Lendvay TS , Chen J , Harcourt BH , Scholte FE , Lin YL , Kilinc-Balci FS , Lamb MM , Homdayjanakul K , Cui Y , Price A , Heyne B , Sahni J , Kabra KB , Lin YC , Evans D , Mores CN , Page K , Chu LF , Haubruge E , Thiry E , Ludwig-Begall LF , Wielick C , Clark T , Wagner T , Timm E , Gallagher T , Faris P , Macia N , Mackie CJ , Simmons SM , Reader S , Malott R , Hope K , Davies JM , Tritsch SR , Dams L , Nauwynck H , Willaert JF , De Jaeger S , Liao L , Zhao M , Laperre J , Jolois O , Smit SJ , Patel AN , Mayo M , Parker R , Molloy-Simard V , Lemyre JL , Chu S , Conly JM , Chu MC . medRxiv 2020 2020.12.11.20236919 Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in severe shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) necessary to protect front-line healthcare personnel. These shortages underscore the urgent need for simple, efficient, and inexpensive methods to decontaminate SARS-CoV-2-exposed PPE enabling safe reuse of masks and respirators. Efficient decontamination must be available not only in low-resourced settings, but also in well-resourced settings affected by PPE shortages. Methylene blue (MB) photochemical treatment, hitherto with many clinical applications including those used to inactivate virus in plasma, presents a novel approach for widely applicable PPE decontamination. Dry heat (DH) treatment is another potential low-cost decontamination method.Methods MB and light (MBL) and DH treatments were used to inactivate coronavirus on respirator and mask material. We tested three N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs), two medical masks (MMs), and one cloth community mask (CM). FFR/MM/CM materials were inoculated with SARS-CoV-2 (a Betacoronavirus), murine hepatitis virus (MHV) (a Betacoronavirus), or porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCV) (an Alphacoronavirus), and treated with 10 µM MB followed by 50,000 lux of broad-spectrum light or 12,500 lux of red light for 30 minutes, or with 75°C DH for 60 minutes. In parallel, we tested respirator and mask integrity using several standard methods and compared to the FDA-authorized vaporized hydrogen peroxide plus ozone (VHP+O3) decontamination method. Intact FFRs/MMs/CM were subjected to five cycles of decontamination (5CD) to assess integrity using International Standardization Organization (ISO), American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) test methods.Findings Overall, MBL robustly and consistently inactivated all three coronaviruses with at least a 4-log reduction. DH yielded similar results, with the exception of MHV, which was only reduced by 2-log after treatment. FFR/MM integrity was maintained for 5 cycles of MBL or DH treatment, whereas one FFR failed after 5 cycles of VHP+O3. Baseline performance for the CM was variable, but reduction of integrity was minimal.Interpretation Methylene blue with light and DH treatment decontaminated masks and respirators by inactivating three tested coronaviruses without compromising integrity through 5CD. MBL decontamination of masks is effective, low-cost and does not require specialized equipment, making it applicable in all-resource settings. These attractive features support the utilization and continued development of this novel PPE decontamination method.Competing Interest StatementAuthors Thomas S. Lendvay, James Chen are Co-Founders and equity owners of Singletto, Inc. (Seattle, WA, USA) Authors Yi Cui and Steven Chu are Co-Founders and equity owners of 4C Air, Inc. (Sunnyvale, CA)Funding StatementThis study was funded by Open Philanthropy; Amazon Inc./University of Washington Catalyst Award; University of Liege (Belgium) and the Walloon Region, Belgium; Li Ka Shing Institute; Alberta Health Services; and an Anonymous donor to the University of Washington, Department of Urology.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Stanford University and Alberta Health Services/University of Calgary were exempt from IRB as the human fit testing was considered Quality Improvement. ERB for clinical specimen use: A clinical saliva specimen with a SARS-CoV-2 was provided by Dr. John Conly from Calgary, Alberta with Calgary ERB approval (ID# Pro00099761).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective inte ventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be freely shared post publication on reasonable request by contacting the corresponding author of the study. |
Serological and metagenomic interrogation of cerebrospinal fluid implicates enteroviruses in pediatric acute flaccid myelitis (preprint)
Schubert RD , Hawes IA , Ramachandran PS , Ramesh A , Crawford ED , Pak JE , Wu W , Cheung CK , O'Donovan BD , Tato CM , Lyden A , Tan M , Sit R , Sowa GA , Sample HA , Zorn KC , Banerji D , Khan LM , Bove R , Hauser SL , Gelfand AA , Johnson-Kerner BL , Nash K , Krishnamoorthy KS , Chitnis T , Ding JZ , McMillan HJ , Chiu CY , Briggs B , Glaser CA , Yen C , Chu V , Wadford DA , Dominguez SR , Ng TFF , Marine RL , Lopez AS , Nix WA , Soldatos A , Gorman MP , Benson L , Messacar K , Konopka-Anstadt JL , Oberste MS , DeRisi JL , Wilson MR . bioRxiv 2019 666230 Background Since 2014, the United States has experienced a biennial spike in pediatric acute flaccid myelitis (AFM). Epidemiologic evidence suggests non-polio enteroviruses (EVs) are a potential etiology, yet EV RNA is rarely detected in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and only inconsistently identified from the respiratory tract, serum, or stool.Methods We interrogated CSF from children with AFM (n=42) and pediatric controls with other neurologic diseases (OND) (n=58). Samples were incubated with T7 bacteriophage expressing 481,966 sixty-two amino acid peptides with a fourteen amino acid overlap tiled across all known vertebrate virus and arbovirus genomes, an adaption of the VirScan method. Antibody-bound phage were deep sequenced to quantify enriched peptides with normalized counts expressed as reads per hundred thousand (rpK). EV antibody findings were confirmed with ELISA using whole viral protein 1 (VP1) from contemporary enterovirus (EV) A71 and D68 strains. Separately, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of CSF RNA, both unbiased and with targeted enrichment for EVs, was performed.Results The most significantly enriched viral family by VirScan of CSF in AFM versus OND controls was Picornaviridae (mean rpK 11,266 versus mean rpK 950, p-adjusted < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni adjustment). Enriched Picornaviridae peptides belonged almost entirely to the genus Enterovirus. The mean EV VP1 ELISA signal in AFM (mean OD 0.51) was significantly higher than OND controls (mean OD 0.08, p-value < 0.001, Mann-Whitney test). mNGS did not detect additional enterovirus RNA in CSF.Conclusion Despite the rare detection of EV RNA in the CNS of patients with AFM, a pan-viral serologic assay identified high levels of CSF EV antibodies in AFM CSF compared to CSF from OND controls. These results provide further evidence for a causal role of non-polio enteroviruses in AFM. |
Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated risk factors among staff and residents at homeless shelters in King County, Washington: an active surveillance study (preprint)
Rogers JH , Cox SN , Link AC , Nwanne G , Han PD , Pfau B , Chow EJ , Wolf CR , Boeckh M , Hughes JP , Halloran ME , Uyeki TM , Shim MM , Duchin J , Englund JA , Mosites E , Rolfes MA , Starita LA , Chu HY . medRxiv 2023 30 Homeless shelter residents and staff may be at higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, SARS-CoV-2 infection estimates in this population have been reliant on cross-sectional or outbreak investigation data. We conducted routine surveillance and outbreak testing in 23 homeless shelters in King County, Washington to estimate the occurrence of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and risk factors during 1/1/2020 -5/31/2021. Symptom surveys and nasal swabs were collected for SARS-CoV-2 testing by RT-PCR for residents aged >=3 months and staff. We collected 12,915 specimens from 2,930 unique participants. We identified 4.74 (95% CI 4.00 - 5.58) SARS-CoV-2 infections per 100 individuals (residents: 4.96, 95% CI 4.12 - 5.91; staff: 3.86, 95% CI 2.43 - 5.79). Most infections were asymptomatic at time of detection (74%) and detected during routine surveillance (73%). Outbreak testing yielded higher test positivity compared to routine surveillance (2.7% vs. 0.9%). Among those infected, residents were less likely to report symptoms than staff. Participants who were vaccinated against seasonal influenza and were current smokers had lower odds of having an infection detected. Active surveillance that includes SARS-CoV-2 testing of all persons is essential in ascertaining the true burden of SARS-CoV-2 infections among residents and staff of congregate settings. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. |
Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated risk factors among staff and residents at homeless shelters in King County, Washington: an active surveillance study
Rogers JH , Cox SN , Link AC , Nwanne G , Han PD , Pfau B , Chow EJ , Wolf CR , Boeckh M , Hughes JP , Halloran ME , Uyeki TM , Shim MM , Duchin J , Englund JA , Mosites E , Rolfes MA , Starita LA , Chu HY . Epidemiol Infect 2023 151 1-48 Homeless shelter residents and staff may be at higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, | 34 SARS-CoV-2 infection estimates in this population have been reliant on cross-sectional or | 35 outbreak investigation data. We conducted routine surveillance and outbreak testing in 23 | 36 homeless shelters in King County, Washington to estimate the occurrence of laboratory37 confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and risk factors during 1/1/2020 -5/31/2021. Symptom surveys | 38 and nasal swabs were collected for SARS-CoV-2 testing by RT-PCR for residents aged ≥3 | 39 months and staff. We collected 12,915 specimens from 2,930 unique participants. We identified | 40 4.74 (95% CI 4.00 – 5.58) SARS-CoV-2 infections per 100 individuals (residents: 4.96, 95% CI | 41 4.12 – 5.91; staff: 3.86, 95% CI 2.43 – 5.79). Most infections were asymptomatic at time of | 42 detection (74%) and detected during routine surveillance (73%). Outbreak testing yielded higher | 43 test positivity compared to routine surveillance (2.7% vs. 0.9%). Among those infected, | 44 residents were less likely to report symptoms than staff. Participants who were vaccinated | 45 against seasonal influenza and were current smokers had lower odds of having an infection | 46 detected. Active surveillance that includes SARS-CoV-2 testing of all persons is essential in | 47 ascertaining the true burden of SARS-CoV-2 infections among residents and staff of congregate | 48 settings. |
CASCADIA: a prospective community-based study protocol for assessing SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness in children and adults using a remote nasal swab collection and web-based survey design
Babu TM , Feldstein LR , Saydah S , Acker Z , Boisvert CL , Briggs-Hagen M , Carone M , Casto A , Cox SN , Ehmen B , Englund JA , Fortmann SP , Frivold CJ , Groom H , Han PD , Kuntz JL , Lockwood T , Midgley CM , Mularski RA , Ogilvie T , Reich SL , Schmidt MA , Smith N , Starita L , Stone J , Vandermeer M , Weil AA , Wolf CR , Chu HY , Naleway AL . BMJ Open 2023 13 (7) e071446 INTRODUCTION: Although SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were first approved under Emergency Use Authorization by the Food and Drug Administration in late 2020 for adults, authorisation for young children 6 months to <5 years of age did not occur until 2022. These authorisations were based on clinical trials, understanding real-world vaccine effectiveness (VE) in the setting of emerging variants is critical. The primary goal of this study is to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 VE against infection among children aged >6 months and adults aged <50 years. METHODS: CASCADIA is a 4-year community-based prospective study of SARS-CoV-2 VE among 3500 adults and paediatric populations aged 6 months to 49 years in Oregon and Washington, USA. At enrolment and regular intervals, participants complete a sociodemographic questionnaire. Individuals provide a blood sample at enrolment and annually thereafter, with optional blood draws every 6 months and after infection and vaccination. Participants complete weekly self-collection of anterior nasal swabs and symptom questionnaires. Swabs are tested for SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens by reverse transcription-PCR, with results of selected pathogens returned to participants; nasal swabs with SARS-CoV-2 detected will undergo whole genome sequencing. Participants who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 undergo serial swab collection every 3 days for 21 days. Serum samples are tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibody by binding and neutralisation assays. ANALYSIS: The primary outcome is SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cox regression models will be used to estimate the incidence rate ratio associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among the paediatric and adult population, controlling for demographic factors and other potential confounders. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All study materials including the protocol, consent forms, data collection instruments, participant communication and recruitment materials, were approved by the Kaiser Permanente Interregional Institutional Review Board, the IRB of record for the study. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, presentations, participant newsletters and appropriate general news media. |
Streptococcus pneumoniae nasal carriage patterns with and without common respiratory virus detections in households in Seattle, WA, USA before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
Bennett JC , Emanuels A , Heimonen J , O'Hanlon J , Hughes JP , Han PD , Chow EJ , Ogokeh CE , Rolfes MA , Lockwood CM , Pfau B , Uyeki TM , Shendure J , Hoag S , Fay K , Lee J , Sibley TR , Rogers JH , Starita LM , Englund JA , Chu HY . Front Pediatr 2023 11 1198278 BACKGROUND: Respiratory viruses might influence Streptococcus pneumoniae nasal carriage and subsequent disease risk. We estimated the association between common respiratory viruses and semiquantitative S. pneumoniae nasal carriage density in a household setting before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: From November 2019-June 2021, we enrolled participants in a remote household surveillance study of respiratory pathogens. Participants submitted weekly reports of acute respiratory illness (ARI) symptoms. Mid-turbinate or anterior nasal swabs were self-collected at enrollment, when ARI occurred, and, in the second year of the study only, from household contacts after SARS-CoV-2 was detected in a household member. Specimens were tested using multiplex reverse-transcription PCR for respiratory pathogens, including S. pneumoniae, rhinovirus, adenovirus, common human coronavirus, influenza A/B virus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) A/B, human metapneumovirus, enterovirus, and human parainfluenza virus. We estimated differences in semiquantitative S. pneumoniae nasal carriage density, estimated by the inverse of S. pneumoniae relative cycle threshold (Crt) values, with and without viral detection for any virus and for specific respiratory viruses using linear generalized estimating equations of S. pneumoniae Crt values on virus detection adjusted for age and swab type and accounting for clustering of swabs within households. RESULTS: We collected 346 swabs from 239 individuals in 151 households that tested positive for S. pneumoniae (n = 157 with and 189 without ≥1 viruses co-detected). Difficulty breathing, cough, and runny nose were more commonly reported among individuals with specimens with viral co-detection compared to without (15%, 80% and 93% vs. 8%, 57%, and 51%, respectively) and ear pain and headache were less commonly reported (3% and 26% vs. 16% and 41%, respectively). For specific viruses among all ages, semiquantitative S. pneumoniae nasal carriage density was greater with viral co-detection for enterovirus, RSV A/B, adenovirus, rhinovirus, and common human coronavirus (P < 0.01 for each). When stratified by age, semiquantitative S. pneumoniae nasal carriage density was significantly greater with viral co-detection among children aged <5 (P = 0.002) and 5-17 years (P = 0.005), but not among adults aged 18-64 years (P = 0.29). CONCLUSION: Detection of common respiratory viruses was associated with greater concurrent S. pneumoniae semiquantitative nasal carriage density in a household setting among children, but not adults. |
Previous health care experiences' influence on health care perceptions among residents of six homeless shelters in Seattle, Washington, July-October 2021
Meehan AA , Cox SN , Thuo NB , Rogers JH , Link AC , Martinez MA , Lo NK , Manns BJ , Rolfes MA , Chow EJ , Chu HY , Mosites E , Al Achkar M . J Patient Cent Res Rev 2023 10 (3) 111-120 PURPOSE: The study purpose was to learn and describe 1) where homeless shelter residents receive health care, 2) what contributes to positive or negative health care experiences among shelter residents, and 3) shelter resident perceptions toward health care. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews (SSIs) utilizing purposive sampling and focus group discussions (FGDs) utilizing convenience sampling were conducted at 6 homeless shelters in Seattle-King County, Washington, during July-October 2021. All residents (age ≥18) were eligible to participate. SSIs were conducted with 25 residents, and 8 FGDs were held. Thematic analysis was conducted using Dedoose. RESULTS: Participants received health care in settings ranging from no regular care to primary care providers. Four elements emerged as contributing positively and negatively to health care experiences: 1) ability to access health care financially, physically, and technologically; 2) clarity of communication from providers and staff about appointment logistics, diagnoses, and treatment options; 3) ease of securing timely follow-up services; and 4) respect versus stigma and discrimination from providers and staff. Participants who felt positively toward health care found low- or no-cost care to be widely available and encouraged others to seek care. However, some participants described health care in the United States as greedy, classist, discriminatory, and untrustworthy. Participants reported delaying care and self-medicating in anticipation of discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate that while people experiencing homelessness can have positive experiences with health care, many have faced negative interactions with health systems. Improving the patient experience for those experiencing homelessness can increase engagement and improve health outcomes. |
CASCADIA: A prospective community-based study protocol for assessing SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness in children and adults utilizing a remote nasal swab collection and web-based survey design (preprint)
Babu TM , Feldstein LR , Saydah S , Acker Z , Boisvert CL , Briggs-Hagen M , Carone M , Casto A , Cox SN , Ehmen B , Englund JA , Fortmann SP , Frivold CJ , Groom H , Han P , Kuntz JL , Lockwood T , Midgley CM , Mularski RA , Ogilvie T , Reich S , Schmidt MA , Smith N , Starita L , Stone J , Vandermeer M , Weil AA , Wolf CR , Chu HY , Naleway AL . medRxiv 2023 07 Introduction: Although SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were first approved under Emergency Use Authorization by the FDA in late 2020 for adults, approval for young children 6 months to < 5 years of age did not occur until 2022. Understanding real world vaccine effectiveness in the setting of emerging variants is critical. The primary goal of this study is to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against infection among children aged >6 months and adults aged <50 years. Method(s): CASCADIA is a four-year community-based prospective study of SARS-CoV-2 VE among adult and pediatric populations aged 6 months to 49 years in Oregon and Washington. At enrollment and regular intervals, participants complete a sociodemographic questionnaire. Individuals provide a blood sample at enrollment and annually thereafter, with additional, optional blood draws after infection and vaccination. Participants complete weekly self-collection of anterior nasal swabs and symptom questionnaires. Swabs are tested for SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens by RT-PCR, with results of selected pathogens returned to participants; nasal swabs with SARS-CoV-2 detected will undergo whole genome sequencing. Participants who report symptoms outside of their weekly swab collection and symptom survey are asked to collect an additional swab. Participants who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 undergo serial swab collection every three days for three weeks. Serum samples are tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibody by binding and neutralization assays. Analysis: Cox regression models will be used to estimate the hazard ratio associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among the pediatric and adult population, controlling for demographic factors and potential confounders, including clustering within households. Ethics and dissemination: All study materials including the protocol, consent forms, participant communication and recruitment materials, and data collection instruments were approved by the Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) Institutional Review Board, the IRB of record for the study. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license. |
A Genomic Survey of SARS-CoV-2 Reveals Multiple Introductions into Northern California without a Predominant Lineage (preprint)
Deng X , Gu W , Federman S , du Plessis L , Pybus OG , Faria N , Wang C , Yu G , Pan CY , Guevara H , Sotomayor-Gonzalez A , Zorn K , Gopez A , Servellita V , Hsu E , Miller S , Bedford T , Greninger AL , Roychoudhury P , Starita LM , Famulare M , Chu HY , Shendure J , Jerome KR , Anderson C , Gangavarapu K , Zeller M , Spencer E , Andersen KG , MacCannell D , Paden CR , Li Y , Zhang J , Tong S , Armstrong G , Morrow S , Willis M , Matyas BT , Mase S , Kasirye O , Park M , Chan C , Yu AT , Chai SJ , Villarino E , Bonin B , Wadford DA , Chiu CY . medRxiv 2020 The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has spread globally, resulting in >300,000 reported cases worldwide as of March 21st, 2020. Here we investigate the genetic diversity and genomic epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 in Northern California using samples from returning travelers, cruise ship passengers, and cases of community transmission with unclear infection sources. Virus genomes were sampled from 29 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection from Feb 3rd through Mar 15th. Phylogenetic analyses revealed at least 8 different SARS-CoV-2 lineages, suggesting multiple independent introductions of the virus into the state. Virus genomes from passengers on two consecutive excursions of the Grand Princess cruise ship clustered with those from an established epidemic in Washington State, including the WA1 genome representing the first reported case in the United States on January 19th. We also detected evidence for presumptive transmission of SARS-CoV-2 lineages from one community to another. These findings suggest that cryptic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Northern California to date is characterized by multiple transmission chains that originate via distinct introductions from international and interstate travel, rather than widespread community transmission of a single predominant lineage. Rapid testing and contact tracing, social distancing, and travel restrictions are measures that will help to slow SARS-CoV-2 spread in California and other regions of the USA. |
Respiratory syncytial virus and other respiratory virus infections in residents of homeless shelters - King County, Washington, 2019-2021
McCulloch DJ , Rogers JH , Wang Y , Chow EJ , Link AC , Wolf CR , Uyeki TM , Rolfes MA , Mosites E , Sereewit J , Duchin JS , Sugg NK , Greninger AL , Boeckh MJ , Englund JA , Shendure J , Hughes JP , Starita LM , Roychoudhury P , Chu HY . Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2023 17 (6) e13166 Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes disproportionate morbidity and mortality in vulnerable populations. We tested residents of homeless shelters in Seattle, Washington for RSV in a repeated cross-sectional study as part of community surveillance for respiratory viruses. Of 15 364 specimens tested, 35 had RSV detected, compared to 77 with influenza. The most common symptoms for both RSV and influenza were cough and rhinorrhea. Many individuals with RSV (39%) and influenza (58%) reported that their illness significantly impacted their ability to perform their regular activities. RSV and influenza demonstrated similar clinical presentations and burden of illness in vulnerable populations living in congregate settings. |
Impact and effectiveness of Rotavin-M1 under conditions of routine use in two provinces in Vietnam, 2016-2021, an observational and case-control study
Van Trang N , Tate JE , Phuong Mai LT , Vu TD , Quyet NT , Thi Le LK , Thi Chu MN , Ngoc Tran MP , Thi Pham TP , Nguyen HT , Hien ND , Jiang B , Yen C , Tran DN , Anh DD , Parashar UD , Anh LT , Thanh VD , Sanh LV , Dieu Thuy DT , Trang DC , Phong NQ , Truong DH , Tai TV , Dung PV , Van DV . Lancet Reg Health West Pac 2023 37 100789 Background: Half of diarrhea hospitalizations in children aged <5 years in Vietnam are due to rotavirus. Following introduction of a locally developed and licensed oral rotavirus vaccine, Rotavin-M1, into the routine immunization program in two Vietnamese provinces, Nam Dinh and TT Hue, we describe changes in rotavirus positivity among children hospitalized for diarrhea and calculate vaccine effectiveness against moderate-to-severe rotavirus hospitalizations. Methods: Active rotavirus surveillance among children <5 years began in December 2016 at sentinel hospitals in districts where rotavirus vaccine was introduced in December 2017. To estimate reductions in rotavirus detection, we calculated risk ratios comparing rotavirus positivity pre- and post-vaccine introduction. We used a test-negative case–control design to calculate vaccine effectiveness. Findings: From December 2016 to May 2021, 7228 children <5 years hospitalized for diarrhea were enrolled. Following introduction, Rotavin-M1 coverage was 77% (1066/1377) in Nam Dinh and 42% (203/489) in TT Hue. In Nam Dinh, rotavirus positivity among children <5 years significantly declined by 40.6% (95% CI: 34.8%–45.8%) during the three-year post-vaccine introduction period. In TT Hue, no change in rotavirus positivity was observed. Among children aged 6–23 months, a 2-dose series of Rotavin-M1 was 57% (95% CI: 39%–70%) effective against moderate-to-severe rotavirus hospitalizations. Interpretation: Higher vaccination coverage in Nam Dinh than TT Hue likely contributed to substantial declines in rotavirus positivity observed in Nam Dinh following rotavirus vaccine introduction. Robust vaccine effectiveness was observed through the second year of life. National rotavirus vaccine introduction with high coverage may have substantial impact on reducing rotavirus disease burden in Vietnam. Funding: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. © 2023 |
Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 - Final Report
Beigel JH , Tomashek KM , Dodd LE , Mehta AK , Zingman BS , Kalil AC , Hohmann E , Chu HY , Luetkemeyer A , Kline S , Lopez de Castilla D , Finberg RW , Dierberg K , Tapson V , Hsieh L , Patterson TF , Paredes R , Sweeney DA , Short WR , Touloumi G , Lye DC , Ohmagari N , Oh MD , Ruiz-Palacios GM , Benfield T , Fätkenheuer G , Kortepeter MG , Atmar RL , Creech CB , Lundgren J , Babiker AG , Pett S , Neaton JD , Burgess TH , Bonnett T , Green M , Makowski M , Osinusi A , Nayak S , Lane HC , ACTT-1 Study Group Members , Uyeki Timothy . N Engl J Med 2020 383 (19) 1813-1826 BACKGROUND: Although several therapeutic agents have been evaluated for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), no antiviral agents have yet been shown to be efficacious. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous remdesivir in adults who were hospitalized with Covid-19 and had evidence of lower respiratory tract infection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either remdesivir (200 mg loading dose on day 1, followed by 100 mg daily for up to 9 additional days) or placebo for up to 10 days. The primary outcome was the time to recovery, defined by either discharge from the hospital or hospitalization for infection-control purposes only. RESULTS: A total of 1062 patients underwent randomization (with 541 assigned to remdesivir and 521 to placebo). Those who received remdesivir had a median recovery time of 10 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 9 to 11), as compared with 15 days (95% CI, 13 to 18) among those who received placebo (rate ratio for recovery, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.49; P<0.001, by a log-rank test). In an analysis that used a proportional-odds model with an eight-category ordinal scale, the patients who received remdesivir were found to be more likely than those who received placebo to have clinical improvement at day 15 (odds ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.9, after adjustment for actual disease severity). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of mortality were 6.7% with remdesivir and 11.9% with placebo by day 15 and 11.4% with remdesivir and 15.2% with placebo by day 29 (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.03). Serious adverse events were reported in 131 of the 532 patients who received remdesivir (24.6%) and in 163 of the 516 patients who received placebo (31.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that remdesivir was superior to placebo in shortening the time to recovery in adults who were hospitalized with Covid-19 and had evidence of lower respiratory tract infection. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; ACTT-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04280705.). |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:May 06, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure